the rank one tensors’ basis changes
Tag Archives: algebra
Einstein-Penrose ‘s strong sum convention
Filed under math, mathematics, multilinear algebra, word algebra
short exact sequence and center
Let us prove:
Let be a short exact sequence, if the center then
Proof: When then , so .
Therefore
Filed under 3-manifold, algebra, group theory, word algebra
wedge product example
When bivectors are defined by
,
so, for two generic covectors
and ,
we have the bivector
.
Otherwise,
Cf. this with the data and to construct the famous
So, nobody should be confused about the uses of the symbol dans le calcul vectoriel XD
Kurosh theorem à la Ribes-Steinberg
Filed under math
permutational wreath product
Having an action between two groups means a map that comply
Then one can assemble a new operation on to construct the semidirect product . The group obtained is by operating
Let be a set and the set of all maps . If we have an action then, we also can give action via
Then we define
the so called permutational wreath product.
This ultra-algebraic construction allow to give a proof of two pillars theorems in group theory: Nielsen – Schreier and Kurosh.
The proof becomes functorial due the properties of this wreath product.
The following diagram is to be exploited
Filed under algebra, free group, group theory, math, maths, what is math
double coset counting formula
the double coset counting formula is a relation inter double cosets , where and subgroups in . This is:
and
One is to be bounded to the study of the natural map . And it uses the second abstraction lemma.
The formula allows you to see the kinds of subgroups of arbitrary versus a of , for the set of the – Sylow subgroups.
Or, you can see that through the action via you can get:
- which comply the equi-partition
- , so , for some
then you can deduce:
Now, let us use those ideas to prove the next statement:
Let be a finite group, with cardinal , where each are primes with and positive integers.
Let be a subgroup of of index .
Then, is normal.
Proof:
By employing in the double coset partition, one get the decomposition:
So by the double coset counting formula you arrive to:
i.e.
From this, we get .
But as well so
, i.e.
divides
Then . So for each .
This implies and so for all the posible , hence, is normal.
QED.
Filed under algebra, categoría, category theory, fiber bundle, group theory, math, math analysis, mathematics, maths, what is math, what is mathematics