covariant derivative of covectors

How do you think that the covariant derivative in \mathbb{R}^3 is extended over covector fields defined over a surface \Phi:{\mathbb{R}}^2\hookrightarrow\Sigma\subset{\mathbb{R}}^3?

We use the Riesz Representation’s Lemma, so if

dx^k(\quad)=\langle\partial^k,\quad\rangle=\langle g^{sk}\partial_s,\quad\rangle


\nabla_{\partial_i}dx^k(\quad)=\langle \nabla_{\partial_i}\partial^k,\quad\rangle=\langle -{\Gamma^k}_{is}\partial^s,\quad\rangle

This implies that we have:


This contrast nicely with \nabla_{\partial_i}\partial_k={\Gamma^s}_{ik}\partial_s

For a general w=w_sdx^s, we use the Leibniz’s rule to get




The proof that \nabla_{\partial_i}\partial^k=\nabla_{\partial_i}(g^{sk}\partial_s)=-{\Gamma^k}_{is}\partial^s is very fun!

You gotta remember firmly that the \partial^k=g^{sk}\partial_s form the reciprocal coordinated basis, still tangent vectors but representing (à la Riesz) the coordinated covectors dx^k.

Leave a comment

Filed under differential geometry, multilinear algebra

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s